Ameriprise Financial2026-Q1
Ameriprise Financial Inc. filed its 13F for the first quarter of 2026, revealing a significant rotation out of mega-cap tech and into energy and other sectors.
| Ticker | Action | Value Change |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA | Trim | -$1.50B |
| MSFT | Trim | -$4.38B |
| EOG | Add | +$906.8M |
| META | Add | -$625.9M (real buying, value fell—NOT a sell) |
| CVX | Trim | +$810.8M (real selling, value rose—NOT a buy) |
Ameriprise trimmed NVDA by -$1.50B, reducing its portfolio weight from 3.97% to 3.72%. MSFT was cut by -$4.38B, bringing its weight down to 2.66% from 3.59%. These reductions, along with other tech trims, lowered the Information Technology weighting from 32.7% to 31.0%. The fund's turnover ratio climbed to 0.215 from 0.150, reflecting an active quarter.
Ameriprise added to EOG by +$906.8M, raising its weight from 0.14% to 0.36%, and to COP by +$745.2M, lifting its weight from 0.29% to 0.47%. Both are now among the larger holdings in the expanding Energy allocation, which grew from 3.56% to 5.09%. This move aligns with a broader tilt toward value and cyclical stocks.
For META, shares were added (real buying), but the dollar value fell by -$625.9M because the stock price dropped more than the added shares were worth—'NOT a sell'. The same dynamic applies to AAPL (-$590.0M), AVGO (-$432.9M), and LLY (-$354.2M). Conversely, CVX was trimmed (real selling), yet its value rose by +$810.8M as the price gain outweighed the share reduction—'NOT a buy'. These notes prevent misinterpreting price-driven changes as active trading decisions.
Ameriprise initiated a 0.26% position in AZN worth $1.13B, while fully selling out of AZNN, which had previously been valued at $965.7M (0.22% weight). The swap reflects a preference for one share class over the other within AstraZeneca. The broader Health Care sector weight nudged up from 9.66% to 10.13%.
Ameriprise's Q1 activity shows a deliberate strategy: trim expensive tech names, accumulate energy and cyclical positions, and refine healthcare exposure. The detailed explanations of price-driven value moves serve as a reminder that reported dollar changes do not always reflect the manager's active intent—the underlying action is the true signal.